<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Hold Your Breath: Chuck Palahniuk&#8217;s Choke [PART 2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.monsterfresh.com/2008/09/20/dont-hold-your-breath-chuck-palahniuks-choke-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.monsterfresh.com/2008/09/20/dont-hold-your-breath-chuck-palahniuks-choke-part-2/</link>
	<description>Dancing About Architecture Since 2007</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead C</title>
		<link>http://www.monsterfresh.com/2008/09/20/dont-hold-your-breath-chuck-palahniuks-choke-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25050</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monsterfresh.com/?p=1000#comment-25050</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting.  I&#039;ve gotten a lot of shit for this review for people that refuse to accept reality on other sites.  I feel that I would be doing a disservice to readers and creators if I sugar coat something that I feel is garbage.

The most common protests that I hear refer to the idea that they worked with what they had, as far as time and finances, and that a screenplay is supposed to be a different animal than a book.  My response to that is that they took what I liked out and replaced it with shit that I didn&#039;t and that if you can&#039;t make it right don&#039;t touch it at all.  I was trying to review a film, I don&#039;t think that anyone should have to review a film with the constant restriction of having to factor in how it was produced because, if it&#039;s well made, the actual production should be the last thing that you are aware of while watching it.

I really do appreciate your open minded and thoughtful response.  I would even have appreciated a negative one as long as it was thought out as yours was and not fueled by defensiveness like so many others.  You&#039;ve obviously seen the film and my guess is that you probably found a few blindly positive reviews of the film already on line.  I actually wrote this for you and other people like myself who felt the same way and were tired of reading reviews that they knew were bullshit.

thanks again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting.  I&#8217;ve gotten a lot of shit for this review for people that refuse to accept reality on other sites.  I feel that I would be doing a disservice to readers and creators if I sugar coat something that I feel is garbage.</p>
<p>The most common protests that I hear refer to the idea that they worked with what they had, as far as time and finances, and that a screenplay is supposed to be a different animal than a book.  My response to that is that they took what I liked out and replaced it with shit that I didn&#8217;t and that if you can&#8217;t make it right don&#8217;t touch it at all.  I was trying to review a film, I don&#8217;t think that anyone should have to review a film with the constant restriction of having to factor in how it was produced because, if it&#8217;s well made, the actual production should be the last thing that you are aware of while watching it.</p>
<p>I really do appreciate your open minded and thoughtful response.  I would even have appreciated a negative one as long as it was thought out as yours was and not fueled by defensiveness like so many others.  You&#8217;ve obviously seen the film and my guess is that you probably found a few blindly positive reviews of the film already on line.  I actually wrote this for you and other people like myself who felt the same way and were tired of reading reviews that they knew were bullshit.</p>
<p>thanks again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://www.monsterfresh.com/2008/09/20/dont-hold-your-breath-chuck-palahniuks-choke-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-25026</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monsterfresh.com/?p=1000#comment-25026</guid>
		<description>I think your review summed up the movie perfectly. It took an amazing book with dynamic characters, an amazing plot line, and a psychological mind trip and destroyed it in somewhat of an hour. Clark Gregg misinterpreted the book so much, it felt like he read a quick summary of the book and then wrote a shitty screenplay; or, even worse, he read it but couldn&#039;t grasp the depth and symbolism the book had to offer. The movie was a disappointment all around. 

Not only were the characters static though out the whole movie, but they were vastly changed. For example, Page was not a med school dropout, she was from the future and needed Victor&#039;s sperm so she could take it to the future with her. That is why it was a surprise at the end when no one could find her a the hospital because she was supposed to return to her future. I also agree with Dead C. when he states that the depiction of Denny was obliterated in the movie. All in all this movie was a waste of time and I am disgusted that it won anything at all. Clark Gregg should be chastised for this abomination. 

This movie does not reflect Chuck Palahniuck as a writer. I truly hope anyone who has seen the movie has either read the book first to see what a terrible adaptation this was or will read the book shortly after to make sense of that mess.

Thank you Dead C. for writing a wonderful, honest, and quite humorous  review.

Lyn-z S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your review summed up the movie perfectly. It took an amazing book with dynamic characters, an amazing plot line, and a psychological mind trip and destroyed it in somewhat of an hour. Clark Gregg misinterpreted the book so much, it felt like he read a quick summary of the book and then wrote a shitty screenplay; or, even worse, he read it but couldn&#8217;t grasp the depth and symbolism the book had to offer. The movie was a disappointment all around. </p>
<p>Not only were the characters static though out the whole movie, but they were vastly changed. For example, Page was not a med school dropout, she was from the future and needed Victor&#8217;s sperm so she could take it to the future with her. That is why it was a surprise at the end when no one could find her a the hospital because she was supposed to return to her future. I also agree with Dead C. when he states that the depiction of Denny was obliterated in the movie. All in all this movie was a waste of time and I am disgusted that it won anything at all. Clark Gregg should be chastised for this abomination. </p>
<p>This movie does not reflect Chuck Palahniuck as a writer. I truly hope anyone who has seen the movie has either read the book first to see what a terrible adaptation this was or will read the book shortly after to make sense of that mess.</p>
<p>Thank you Dead C. for writing a wonderful, honest, and quite humorous  review.</p>
<p>Lyn-z S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observations from Missy&#8217;s Window &#187; Movie Monday &#8220;Thing, you&#8217;re a handful.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.monsterfresh.com/2008/09/20/dont-hold-your-breath-chuck-palahniuks-choke-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-22660</link>
		<dc:creator>Observations from Missy&#8217;s Window &#187; Movie Monday &#8220;Thing, you&#8217;re a handful.&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 05:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monsterfresh.com/?p=1000#comment-22660</guid>
		<description>[...] C presents Don?t Hold Your Breath: Chuck Palahniuk?s Choke [PART 2] posted at MonsterFresh.com, saying, &#8220;This is a brutal review including tons of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C presents Don?t Hold Your Breath: Chuck Palahniuk?s Choke [PART 2] posted at MonsterFresh.com, saying, &#8220;This is a brutal review including tons of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

